Election records · Sources in contextIndependent project · About our sources

Election results · 2022 · AC 254

Phaphamau 2022 Assembly election result

Final constituency result from ECI’s 2022 statistical report, with vote totals and source references for every contestant.

Winner in 2022
GURU PRASAD MAURYA91,186 Votes · 43.26%Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)
Winning margin
14,324Votes
Contestants
21

Runner-up in 2022: ANSAR AHMAD (SP) · 76,862 Votes.

Official source for the winning result
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,223
Source check date and definitions

Names of contestants, constituencies and parties are reproduced in English as recorded in the source.

Contestant results

Reconciled official result

Ranked by candidate votes. NOTA is shown separately and is not counted as a contestant.

On a small screen, scroll the table sideways for every vote column and source. Open a name for the contestant’s result.

Phaphamau — Uttar Pradesh Assembly election 2022
RankContestantPartyGeneral votesPostal votesVotesVote shareSource
1GURU PRASAD MAURYAWon · 2022BJP90,82935791,18643.26%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,223
2ANSAR AHMADSP76,34351976,86236.47%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,224
3OM PRAKASHBSP27,2048227,28612.95%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,225
4LAKSHMI NARAYANJDL2,89342,8971.37%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,226
5DURGESH PANDEYINC2,379122,3911.13%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,227
6GYAN PRAKASH MOURYAJANADIP1,61841,6220.77%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,228
7DILIP KUMAR KUSHWAHAIND1,26401,2640.60%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,229
8MITHLESH KUMAR PRAJAPATIIND1,17231,1750.56%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,230
9PARUL JAISWALIND63506350.30%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,231
10VINOD KUMARYVP57205720.27%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,232
11PRAVEEN KUMARIND56005600.27%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,233
12MANGLA PRASAD PALRSUP51315140.24%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,235
12UDAIBHAN SINGH YADEVIND51315140.24%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,236
14SANJAY PRAKASH SHUKLAAAAP46524670.22%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,237
15JITENDRA KUMAR BHARTIYALJPRV44804480.21%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,238
16VINOD KUMAR PANDEYIND41804180.20%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,239
17PANKAJ PANDEYABHSLP37643800.18%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,240
18SANJAYA KUMAR YADAVRTORP30713080.15%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,241
19RAJESWARI PATELJJUI30203020.14%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,242
20SHIVENDRA KUMARIND24402440.12%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,243
21SUBHASH CHANDRASMKP21102110.10%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,244
—None of the Above (NOTA)—51525170.25%
PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,234

NOTA is a ballot choice, not a person or party. Vote share is the percentage reported by ECI. Its denominator is the seat’s candidate + NOTA vote total; reported percentages may differ slightly because of rounding.

Vote totals

Votes for candidates
2,10,256
NOTA votes
517
Reported seat total
2,10,773
General votes
2,09,781
Postal votes
992
Registered electors
3,66,164

Totals reconcile

Sum of all candidate votes plus NOTA equals the reported seat total. General and postal vote channels also reconcile.

The total shown here is candidate votes plus NOTA, including general and postal channels in this table. It is not an estimate of all ballot papers, rejected ballots or today’s electorate.

PDF pages 88, 89Worksheet row 3,245

Sources and definitions

Published by the Election Commission of India. Read the original report and use the worksheet row or physical PDF page to locate each record.

Winner in 2022: Open ECI winners report · Worksheet row 256

Source and verification status

Official result rows have been mechanically reconciled and checked against the source reports. This does not verify an affidavit declaration or a cross-election personal identity.

Winning margin is winner votes minus runner-up votes in this election. It is a vote count, not percentage points.

A source-row identifier identifies a contestant in one constituency and election. Similar names in other seats or years have not been merged.

Source retrieved: . Publication date not supplied.